Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 14th Sep 2010 22:42 UTC
Ubuntu, Kubuntu, Xubuntu If there's one consistent piece of criticism that gets lobbed in Canonical's and Mark Shuttleworth's direction, it's that they do not contribute enough code - or anything else for that matter - to the Free software world. Mark Shuttleworth has apparently had enough, and has written a very, very lengthy blog post detailing how he feels about this criticism.
Thread beginning with comment 441135
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
SlackerJack
Member since:
2005-11-12

I didn't say Ubuntu made the codec install easy, I said it's easy in their distro. Other distros just don't have this setup right or they don't have the repos to support the codecs that are being asked for.

As for Packagekit, yeah it's pretty decent(Note that I didn't mention it as one of the bad package managers) but as pointed out on planet GNOME, the update systems' descriptions of it's updates are very ambiguous.

Edited 2010-09-15 13:28 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2

felipec Member since:
2007-09-25

I didn't say Ubuntu made the codec install easy, I said it's easy in their distro. Other distros just don't have this setup right or they don't have the repos to support the codecs that are being asked for.

Have you tried or are you just guessing? It works just fine here.

Reply Parent Score: 1

SlackerJack Member since:
2005-11-12

Providing you have the repos to support the codec installer, it will works but my point is, distros like Fedora, openSUSE and most others don't, so there for it's not seamless.

Edited 2010-09-15 22:53 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2