Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 15th Sep 2010 21:49 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 441310
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: So now flash can use >4GB
by lemur2 on Thu 16th Sep 2010 14:12
in reply to "RE[2]: So now flash can use >4GB"
Windows 7 64-bit - been running flash since the day I got it.
So has my Kubuntu 10.04 installation. I kept my copy of the file:
libflashplayer-10.0.45.2.linux-x86_64.so.tar.gz
... even after Adobe "officially" withdrew this version.
Now that I have downloaded a copy of the file:
flashplayer_square_p1_64bit_linux_091510.tar.gz
... I have replaced the previous file.
Each of these archives contains a single file, called libflashplayer.so
If you create a new variable in Firefox's about:config page called plugin.expose_full_path, and set its value to true, then Mozilla's about:plugins page shows the full path to the plugin executable.
On my Kubuntu 10.04 installation, this says:
File: /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
So that is the file I replaced with the new version.
After I replaced it, the about:plugins page says this:
File: /usr/lib/mozilla/plugins/libflashplayer.so
Version: Shockwave Flash 10.2 d161
This is the new 'square' version.
Hence my Kubuntu 10.04 64-bit - been running flash since the day I got it.
PS: It is only because Adobe's flash plugin is a closed binary that one has to jump through hoops like this. For everything else on the system, Kubuntu just updates automatically through the package manager. This is a good reason in general to avoid closed binaries wherever possible.
Edited 2010-09-16 14:18 UTC
RE[3]: So now flash can use >4GB
by Brunis on Mon 20th Sep 2010 16:02
in reply to "RE[2]: So now flash can use >4GB"




Member since:
2006-03-18
Windows 7 64-bit - been running flash since the day I got it.