Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 14th Sep 2010 13:55 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 441313
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2005-07-06
All those OSs are far behind Symbian in many important aspects. They all require large touch screens, lots or RAM and powerful processors to work. All that adds up to expensive phones with shitty battery life. Symbian on the other hand has non of those problems.
I recently bought a new Symbian phone and it is better than my Android phone in many ways. It cost less than half of even the cheapest Android phone, I only need to charge it once a week, for calling and texting I find it quicker and easier to use than my Android phone and yet it still has wifi, facebook, mp3 player, GPS navigation, browser and all kinds of stuff like that if you ever need it.
So while Symbian is not as powerful as iOS, Andorid and Moblin, it still has many features which makes it in many ways a better OS for actual phones (as opposed to portable media devices).