Linked by mjhi11 on Thu 16th Sep 2010 20:13 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 441539
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-02-19
I dare say that the common consensus would agree with me... Feel free to flame if I'm wrong
No I actually agree with you that it does not run as well as it used to in the older versions. But it isn't completely unusable as all the complainers claim. Actually it has suffered from bloat from all the device support and other features that make it run slow on older hardware. That is the key, if you have a PowerPC anything it is going to run slow. I am using intel and it is acceptable.
The quibbles beside, it is still a decent application and I use it regularly.