Linked by mjhi11 on Thu 16th Sep 2010 20:13 UTC
Apple I love OSNews, but it does seem like some of its editors enjoy just a little too much taking a good natured jab at Apple upon occasion (well, more like every chance that particular editor can get). I thought it time for a little good news and analysis about Apple that critics often overlook.
Thread beginning with comment 441659
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Comment by dvhh
by nt_jerkface on Sun 19th Sep 2010 20:36 UTC in reply to "RE[4]: Comment by dvhh"
nt_jerkface
Member since:
2009-08-26


If you are talking about major updates then that is what 10.1, 10.2, 10.3, etc.. are. Why shouldn't they cost money?


Sorry but I don't consider a small list of additions and a few new programs to be a major update. XP SP2 was a bigger update than 10.2 and 10.3 combined.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[6]: Comment by dvhh
by NeoX on Mon 20th Sep 2010 00:42 in reply to "RE[5]: Comment by dvhh"
NeoX Member since:
2006-02-19


Sorry but I don't consider a small list of additions and a few new programs to be a major update. XP SP2 was a bigger update than 10.2 and 10.3 combined.


Then you better do a little more research as that is just plain crazy or you have not used or followed OS X enough. 10.2, 10.3, 10.4 and 10.5 were major updates that brought many, many new features. XP SP2 was a service pack that did bring a few new features, like the security center, but most were around updates to security and networking. You could hardly charge for those types of updates.

Reply Parent Score: 1