Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 19th Sep 2010 20:32 UTC, submitted by sawboss
Thread beginning with comment 441705
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/25/13 0:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 23:59 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 22:33 UTC
Linked by Howard Fosdick on 05/24/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/24/13 14:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-01-07
Hmmm...maybe Intel can get their manufacturing line down to just one chip with 16 multicores. They ship it with just one core enabled, and you pay $50 for each additional core you want to enable. Works in every machine from a netbook to a mainframe. Though expensive to manufacture, Intel bets the company on this great new technology, selling the chips for a loss on low-end machines, expecting to make a fortune from the upgrades, and then...
...whoops! Somebody finds a way to jailbreak it. Google and everyone else decides to run their server farms from Asus eeePCs.
Intel goes bankrupt.
And at last, the ARM chips come into their own! Goodbye x86 processors. ARM rules the world!
OK, I just woke up.
Edited 2010-09-20 00:23 UTC