Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 19th Sep 2010 21:18 UTC, submitted by gireesh
Mandriva, Mandrake, Lycoris It's been a troubling couple of weeks for Mandriva, but I decided not to report on it since I found it hard to unravel the events leading up to all this. Now, though, the story has come to its (logical) conclusion: now that most of Mandriva's employees have been laid off, they came together and forked Mandriva. Enter Mageia.
Thread beginning with comment 441736
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[4]: Linux distro #37264828737
by flynn on Mon 20th Sep 2010 04:04 UTC in reply to "RE[3]: Linux distro #37264828737"
flynn
Member since:
2009-03-19

Linux distros ~= a few hundred
Linux (desktop) users (according to Ballmer): slightly > Mac Osx users ~= 7% of desktop users ~= (rough estimate) 35 million users.

35 million >>> a few hundred.

QED.


Stop taking everything so literally. His comment quite clearly meant that the last thing we need is an yet another linux distro. The numbers themselves are irrelevant, learn to hyperbole.

Reply Parent Score: 4

lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

"Linux distros ~= a few hundred Linux (desktop) users (according to Ballmer): slightly > Mac Osx users ~= 7% of desktop users ~= (rough estimate) 35 million users. 35 million >>> a few hundred. QED.
Stop taking everything so literally. His comment quite clearly meant that the last thing we need is an yet another linux distro. The numbers themselves are irrelevant, learn to hyperbole. "

Who are you to tell me what to do? I know what his comment was meant to imply, and I refute it utterly.

Linux distro's are intended to cover different use cases, in order to make it un-necessary for users to have to identify their own set of packages with perhaps unfamiliar names.

Some examples:

For security (digital forensics, if you will):
http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=06276

Specialist distribution for use as a firewall:
http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=06280

Japanese language:
http://distrowatch.com/?newsid=06273

Boot from portable media:
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=puppy

Home entertainment/TV:
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=mythbuntu

Mathematics and statistics:
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=scientific

System rescue / data recovery:
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=systemrescue

Education:
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=edubuntu

Audio, video & graphics:
http://distrowatch.com/table.php?distribution=ubuntustudio

These are all based on the same few base distributions, and they are simply easy-to-install variations meant for different specific purposes.

Why shouldn't people have the choice of these distributions, and more, if they are found to be useful?

Edited 2010-09-20 04:37 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 0

WereCatf Member since:
2006-02-15

-- buttload of links omitted --

These are all based on the same few base distributions, and they are simply easy-to-install variations meant for different specific purposes.

Why shouldn't people have the choice of these distributions, and more, if they are found to be useful?


Well, there's for example a dozen distros all aimed for desktop use. Ie. they all cater to the same thing, yet there still exists so many of them. And worse, a billion *buntu versions.

I personally think it'd be better to have the base distro only, ie. Ubuntu, and copy the meta-package system from Mandriva; you'd just install Ubuntu, then install task-education and POOF! You'd have all the needed education apps installed for example. Then to polish the thing you could just include a menu-item which then presents the available metapackages, explains them and their meaning, and allows you to easily install them with one click. This'd allow for more unity as there'd only be one Ubuntu, there wouldn't be a need to maintain so many different spin-offs and the devs could instead focus on their respective meta-package, and it'd be simpler for end-users. Well, atleast I think that'd be a good route to take.

Reply Parent Score: 3

flynn Member since:
2009-03-19

Who are you to tell me what to do? I know what his comment was meant to imply, and I refute it utterly.

You did not refute anything, you posted a bunch of numbers in response to a post that was never about numbers to begin with. Again, learn to hyperbole.

Reply Parent Score: 2

Bounty Member since:
2006-09-18


Who are you to tell me what to do? I know what his comment was meant to imply, and I refute it utterly.

Linux distro's are intended to cover different use cases, in order to make it un-necessary for users to have to identify their own set of packages with perhaps unfamiliar names.



Ahhh, the old "I reject your reality and substitute my own" argument. Is it really better if you have to learn the name of the distro with your app, rather than the name of the app? What if you need to do math and multimedia? Do you dual boot?

What are the different use cases this fork came about for? Those who need an established floundering general purpose distro stay with Mandriva, and those who want a floundering general purpose startup go with Megia? Nice.

I think you would have been better of with a simple "I disagree."

Reply Parent Score: 2

jabbotts Member since:
2007-09-06

What's this Ubuntu fork of Debian? The last thing we need is another distro.. oh.. wait.. turns out there was value in yet another distro.

Mandriva is floundering, what's wrong with the technology people who produced Mandriva producing a replacement for it?

Complaining about too many distros is like complaining about to many toothburshes to choose from at the store. A healthy market has choice and in a healthy market products fail and are replaced by competing products.

Reply Parent Score: 4

Bounty Member since:
2006-09-18

What's this Ubuntu fork of Debian? The last thing we need is another distro.. oh.. wait.. turns out there was value in yet another distro.

Mandriva is floundering, what's wrong with the technology people who produced Mandriva producing a replacement for it?

Complaining about too many distros is like complaining about to many toothburshes to choose from at the store. A healthy market has choice and in a healthy market products fail and are replaced by competing products.


Now this is a response on it that I like. +1

Reply Parent Score: 2

nt_jerkface Member since:
2009-08-26


Complaining about too many distros is like complaining about to many toothburshes to choose from at the store. A healthy market has choice and in a healthy market products fail and are replaced by competing products.


Distros are not toothbrushes, they are software projects that require skilled contributers for which there is a limited supply.

It doesn't make sense to have so many of them working on distros whose differences could be encapsulated within themes and custom packages. I realize this is the nature of open source but that doesn't mean that Linux users need to be supportive of all these general purpose distros.

Reply Parent Score: 2