Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 20th Sep 2010 22:22 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 441974
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: A Strange Thought
by Neolander on Wed 22nd Sep 2010 05:42
in reply to "RE: A Strange Thought"
No you don't.
Unlike patents, copyright only covers actually copying other people's work. Independently discovering/writing a text is never copyright infringement - even if the text is identical to an existing copyrighted text.
Unlike patents, copyright only covers actually copying other people's work. Independently discovering/writing a text is never copyright infringement - even if the text is identical to an existing copyrighted text.
That's theory.
If you make a text which is a word-perfect clone of a copyrighted text, you will have a hard time proving in court that it was written independently. In practice, I think proving this is impossible.
RE[3]: A Strange Thought
by raboof on Wed 22nd Sep 2010 06:49
in reply to "RE[2]: A Strange Thought"
"copyright only covers actually copying other people's work. Independently discovering/writing a text is never copyright infringement - even if the text is identical to an existing copyrighted text.
That's theory.
If you make a text which is a word-perfect clone of a copyrighted text, you will have a hard time proving in court that it was written independently. In practice, I think proving this is impossible. "
That's theory.
In almost all practical cases, and certainly in Brendan's case above, it's actually pretty obvious.
Edited 2010-09-22 06:50 UTC
RE[3]: A Strange Thought
by lemur2 on Wed 22nd Sep 2010 07:27
in reply to "RE[2]: A Strange Thought"
If you make a text which is a word-perfect clone of a copyrighted text
If you make a text which is a word-perfect clone of a copyrighted text, I think it is a fair assumption that you copied it.
If you however make a text which is almost entirely different from a copyrighted text, but semantically it parses out to mean effectively the same thing, I think it is an even fairer assumption that you didn't copy it, but rather that you just independently came up with the same ideas.
Edited 2010-09-22 07:29 UTC





Member since:
2005-07-24
No you don't.
Unlike patents, copyright only covers actually copying other people's work. Independently discovering/writing a text is never copyright infringement - even if the text is identical to an existing copyrighted text.