Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 21st Sep 2010 21:15 UTC, submitted by Gregory Plummer
Thread beginning with comment 442020
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[6]: Outdated article
by henderson101 on Wed 22nd Sep 2010 13:37
in reply to "RE[5]: Outdated article"
"The NT kernel traces its roots back to VMS for the VAX, by Digital Equipment.
Not entirely - at least, not in the sense that NT was an evolution of VAX. It's just that the guy who did VMS went on to do NT at Microsoft. "
Of course, using the logic of the OP, the BeOS kernel owes a lot to Mac OS, as a lot of the engineers were either ex Apple engineers or Mac developers in the beginning. In other words, as Thom says, take the "VMS" with a pinch of salt :-)
RE[6]: Outdated article
by Tuishimi on Wed 22nd Sep 2010 15:21
in reply to "RE[5]: Outdated article"
Very true. Having actually worked on VMS it does make me feel some affinity toward NT an NTFS... tho' I think RMS over Files-11 blew NTFS away. It was so nice to work with. Just as DCL blows DOS CMD away. In fact just about everything to do with VMS and the layered services and apps blew Windows away.
(I am a little biased in that regard).
And also as the poster below you mentioned... the relationship of Mac OS to BeOS, ditto. BeOS was so much better than Mac OS at the time... (opinion)
RE[7]: Outdated article
by bogomipz on Wed 22nd Sep 2010 18:49
in reply to "RE[6]: Outdated article"
RE[6]: Outdated article
by tylerdurden on Wed 22nd Sep 2010 23:04
in reply to "RE[5]: Outdated article"





Member since:
2005-06-29
Not entirely - at least, not in the sense that NT was an evolution of VAX. It's just that the guy who did VMS went on to do NT at Microsoft.