To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Because when someone points out that something that Apple has done is a very long way from being perfect he then picks out something he thinks is worse, or just as bad, and that gives him warm fuzzies.
In reality, Amarok is miles better than iTunes because it can actually organise your music the way that you want and in a way that's relevant - not Apple. The functionality it has is also miles ahead of iTunes so I don't know where that came out of the blue from either, but it probably means he knows it's true. Oh, and the vertical tabs are gone.
Edited 2010-09-23 00:48 UTC
Amarok doesn't have vertical tabs since ages.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amarok_%28software%29
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:Amarok_2_3_0.png
I have no information on how well Amarok works recently in conjunction with libimobiledevice, but since Amarok works just fine with ordinary USB devices with VFAT (generic MP3 players) support, I don't see why any iDevice should present a problem any longer.
I used to agree with you. I thought amarok was terrible( as were all the other linuxy media players) but I recently gave it another try. Verdict: its pretty awesome. iTunes always seemed to be the windows media player of the Mac. You can count on it being installed and better than real player, but still so absurdly wrong.





Member since:
2005-11-21
If iTunes is broken then Amarok is DOA. That is a POS piece of Software and it covers only a fraction of the functionality of iTunes.