Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Sep 2010 21:36 UTC, submitted by google_ninja
Thread beginning with comment 442472
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 23:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 22:01 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/23/13 17:52 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 22:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/22/13 13:30 UTC, submitted by JRepin
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 22:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 21:45 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-02-17
http://arewefastyet.com/
http://www.tested.com/news/which-web-browser-can-best-mozillas-new-...
As I expected, even Chrome 6.xxx seems to beat FF 4 in speed.
That testing was for Firefox 4 Beta 6.
Firefox 4 Beta 6 doesn't include Jaegermonkey, it includes only Tracemonkey.
http://arewefastyet.com/
The gold plotline is "moz TM" ... Tracemonkey. This is what you will get in Firefox 4 Beta 6.
The black plotline is Jaegermonkey alone. The purple plotline is Jaegermonkey + Tracemonkey. The latter is what will go in Firefox 4.0 final release.
On Sunspider, Jaegermonkey + Tracemonkey = 430, Tracemonkey alone = 538.
This is a 25% improvement over Firefox 4 Beta 6.
On v8bench, Jaegermonkey + Tracemonkey = 2684, Tracemonkey alone = 5080.
This is a 90% improvement over Firefox 4 Beta 6.
Edited 2010-09-24 11:29 UTC