Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 23rd Sep 2010 20:06 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 442565
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You were playing on a common stereotype, you did not pick Ford for any other reason.
Which stereotype would that be again? I can think of many one might associate with Ford: the gas guzzler, the blue collar ute, the superfluous SUV, the 'chick's car' hatchback, the 'bogan's pride' hatchback/sedan...
or maybe, just maybe, I was playing upon the idea of Ford vehicles being generally average, pedestrian, boring, indistinct, plastic and plain old mediocre, for the purposes of making a f--king joke.
Don't mistake your lack of perspective and imagination for some telepathic insight into the mind of someone else. Besides being arrogant, it just makes you look stupid when you inevitably fail to consider a myriad of likely contingencies.
And Big Macs are made to be served in 5 minutes, not win awards
Ooh, you're a sharp one, you are. Ever consider that that was the joke?
Edited 2010-09-24 17:47 UTC
Yawn.
Of course you didn't mean anything, you were just showing that popularity does not equal quality by example of products that are negatively stereotyped with unrefined mainstream taste. No implications there at all.
Funny how Android is being snapped up by the mainstream but I don't see anyone here questioning its quality based on popularity.





Member since:
2009-08-26
You were playing on a common stereotype, you did not pick Ford for any other reason.
And Big Macs are made to be served in 5 minutes, not win awards.