Linked by vodoomoth on Fri 24th Sep 2010 22:56 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 442662
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-06-12
As far as I can see the poster says nothing about any version.
For the point I'm trying to get across version numbers are irrelevant; What I'm saying is that since .Net was largely based on Java it will always be closer to Java then any other language since Microsoft has to maintain backward compatibility, it can't change that.
I'm not talking about a higher level features which got added later like closures. Which on the surface make the language/platform appear like language X or Y. I'm talking about the platform as a whole; VM, garbage collection, etc.