Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Sep 2010 23:20 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 442718
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Nokia's Big Mistake - Lack Of Innovations
by aliquis on Sat 25th Sep 2010 23:49
in reply to "RE[4]: Nokia's Big Mistake - Lack Of Innovations"
RE[6]: Nokia's Big Mistake - Lack Of Innovations
by Fettarme H-Milch on Sun 26th Sep 2010 00:12
in reply to "RE[5]: Nokia's Big Mistake - Lack Of Innovations"
RE[5]: Nokia's Big Mistake - Lack Of Innovations
by Fettarme H-Milch on Sun 26th Sep 2010 01:58
in reply to "RE[4]: Nokia's Big Mistake - Lack Of Innovations"
Why don't I see it as widespread as iOS and the droid?
Because Maemo 1-5 were never meant to be used widespread. Two or so years ago a Nokia manager said in an interview or a presentation or so that Maemo is a years long path and that it'll take until Maemo 6 (now called MeeGo) to finish that path and all devices released before that would be marketed towards enthusiasts and not the mainstream.
To me that indicates a failure.
No, it just proves that you have no clue.
The N900 was more successful than Nokia expected. Nokia meant to sell it only in very small quantities -- the scope was basically to be a developer-only device to allow them to test Qt applications on a real handset device in preparation for Maemo 6 / MeeGo.
The N900 isn't even marketed as a phone. It's a "mobile computer" according the the official description but that "mobile computer" turned out to be a quite good phone with -- at time of release -- the best mobile Skype client.





Member since:
2006-01-01
It is not? Why don't I see it as widespread as iOS and the droid? To me that indicates a failure. Sure the technology might be good but that doesn't necessarily indicate success.
Edited 2010-09-25 22:04 UTC