Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 21st Sep 2010 21:15 UTC, submitted by Gregory Plummer
GNU, GPL, Open Source "So what is the state of the Hurd? Is it vaporware, like Duke Nukem Forever? Fortunately not: the code exists, there is still work going on (for instance as part of Google Summer of Code), and there are even some relatively functional Hurd distributions. Let's look first at the code and the current architecture, and then at the Hurd distributions."
Thread beginning with comment 442759
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:

You could say the same thing about DragonFlyBSD and it is progressing at a much faster rate.

I agree with the parent that HURD exists for non-technical reasons. Declaring HURD a dead end would be too painful for Stallman. He is extremely jealous of the success of Linux as can be seen by how he yelled at a kid over not calling it GNU/Linux. The guy is a kook and there are better and more interesting alternative Nix kernels in development.

Yeah, but that's BSD. Some devs just prefer GPL, a current rationale being that they don't want to give code to big corporations for free...

<insert licensing debate and history of Webkit and here>

Maybe the reasons are not technical, but not linked to RMS either ?

Edited 2010-09-26 21:22 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 2