Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 24th Sep 2010 23:20 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 442778
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2006-06-21
And I don't see why they should. Some people seem to forget that not everybody wants smartphones. I know, gasp.
A whole lot of people like what feature-phones have to offer:
* People like numeric keypad (esp. with Nokia's arrangement of 4 buttons and click wheel). Not everybody needs or even wants touchscreens.
* People like the lower price. You can get an excellent Nokia phone for 75-100 euros. (Think that's not important? India and China have more than a third of the world's population and most of them are poorer than the Western people. And there are plenty of 2nd and 3rd world countries out there.)
* People like the durability of simpler phones. The more complex the device, the faster it breaks.
* The built-in feature set is enough for them. You can make and receive calls and SMS, have an agenda, a simple calendar (including alarm and notifications), audio player, FM radio, games, take pics and browse with Opera Mini. The more advanced models have WiFi and/or GPS. And that's it.
* Business phones are a subset of feature phones, not of smartphones! The business features may be richer than on regular-user phones, but they are still limited to a built-in set. And business users are also fine with that.
* Finally, if one should hanker for another kind of "smart" device, it doesn't necessarily have to be a phone. It can be a generic device (handheld, tablet or netbook) or a specific one (mini-gaming console, MP3/video player, ebook reader).
Symbian S40 and S60 are perfectly suited for feature-phones and feature phones are still in demand. Sony Ericsson basically decided they want to focus on the smartphone market only and by doing that they practically gave away the featurephone market to Nokia. This is good for Nokia, not bad.
It is, and they are one of the very few companies who can afford to experiment with a new smartphone platform, because they have a solid grounding in the feature phone market.
If this works for them, they will come out with their own in-house developed platform, of which there are precious few around. Currently Blackberry OS, iOS and Android are the only viable alternatives. The likes of Windows Mobile 7, Bada and webOS still have to prove their viability in the wild.