To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Mistake 5 : I don't think that GIMP devs don't listen to their users. I use it since 2.4, and there have been great improvements in usability in successive releases... Let me quote some things.
-2.6 : Tool windows (puts an end to the window focus hell), modifiable selections (VERY handy), menus moved on top of the windows in order to make them simpler (the older ones were quite obfuscated), better lasso (polygonal selection on 2.4 was awful)
-2.8 : Easier alpha to selection (it's often done, so it should be optimized), layer grouping, much better brush dynamics, single-mode windows for those who like it (and can be disabled for people who like it the other way like me), better brushes included by default...
Edited 2010-09-29 13:56 UTC




Member since:
2010-03-08
Mistake 2 : Well, I'm not sure that I agree with him on this one. He seems to disagree with use of the layer/selection/path paradigm in GIMP because it's too complicated and he thinks that it was only introduced for photoshop compatibility.
But there's a reason why photoshop is using this paradigm : though difficult to learn, it's powerful in the end. AFAIK, a UI paradigm for these tasks that's at the same time simpler and just as powerful has not been found yet.
Maybe the author means that GIMP should switch to a simpler paradigm (like that of MSpaint) at the expense of image editing power. But then I disagree : casual editing is not the main usage pattern envisioned by gimp designers, so they should remain consistent with that, even if it alienates casual users. Alas, software design is about choice.