Linked by David Adams on Mon 4th Oct 2010 19:32 UTC, submitted by Idefix
Thread beginning with comment 443736
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Features
Linked by David Adams on 05/16/13 4:23 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/11/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/08/13 14:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/02/13 15:28 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/29/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/24/13 22:24 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/18/13 11:21 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/16/13 9:29 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/15/13 22:44 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 04/14/13 18:22 UTC, submitted by MOS6510
More Features »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2007-11-23
I can't agree with the author. OSs may serve the same thing, but they definitely behave in a different manner. We have good and bad OSs, we have poor and good code, we have good and poor security mechanisms and implementations, etc.
The author's point of view may be probobly valid - to some extent - in the case of some computer novice who doesn't actually see the differences between various OSs, but it doesn't mean that the differences are not there ... doesn't it?