To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Of course MS had an iron grip on the market back then and that didn't help things, but ultimately JLG bet the farm on becoming an Internet Appliance developer with BeIA and that backfired. JLG was just too far ahead of his time. No one had broadband and Facebook addiction wasn't invented yet.
Yeah, he was so "ahead of his time" that BeOS did not even bothered to have a proper networking stack even for its "internet appliance" OS iteration. Sounds more like jumping the shark to me.
The whole BeIA was an attempt at staying afloat by throwing a bowl of spaghetti to the wall and seeing what stuck. I would't call that as being "ahead of one's time" but rather an act of desperation.
Specially if you consider that Be spent a significant deal of effort into their BeFS, touting their filesystem as one of their main value propositions. Only to end up targeting the BeIA platform towards basically diskless clients. Brilliant!
Edited 2010-10-05 19:32 UTC





Member since:
2006-12-05
Huh? I thought Microsoft's monopoly and marketing power, their can-you-say-antitrust "deals" with OEMs, as well as various other things were some of the biggest factors in the demise of Be. Now you're saying its failure was caused by one man alone? Is there a good explanation to support this claim?