Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 7th Oct 2010 19:10 UTC, submitted by tyrione
Thread beginning with comment 444544
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I don't have an emotional attachment to any compiler.
I don't have such attachment either, it's just that I have some sympathy towards GCC because...
-It is the sole C/C++ compiler producing high-performance code which I know of that's not owned by a megalomaniac mega-corporation or a processor manufacturer.
-It has some very useful extensions.
-It works everywhere and for just about every target.
-It's heavily covered by documentation on the internet.
-It's licensed under GPL, which I personally like better than BSD licensing.
Now, if they could only copy LLVM's nice warnings...
Edited 2010-10-08 21:21 UTC




Member since:
2009-08-26
The sole test using up-to-date GCC is the 2010 one, and it shows that GCC 4.5 is often pretty close to ICC in terms of performance, although compilation is much slower.
It at least shows that the common belief is well founded. If you want to find and show some newer benchmarks then by all means please do, I don't have an emotional attachment to any compiler.