Linked by Thom Holwerda on Sun 10th Oct 2010 14:17 UTC, submitted by Extend
Thread beginning with comment 444671
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Meerkats are so Pass�©...
by google_ninja on Sun 10th Oct 2010 15:23
in reply to "RE: Meerkats are so Passé..."
RE[3]: Meerkats are so Passe
by -oblio- on Sun 10th Oct 2010 18:46
in reply to "RE[2]: Meerkats are so Pass�©..."
RE[3]: Meerkats are so PassÃ��Ãï¿&f
by hufman on Sun 10th Oct 2010 23:16
in reply to "RE[2]: Meerkats are so Pass�©..."
RE[2]: Meerkats are so Pass�©...
by gloucestershrubhill on Sun 10th Oct 2010 19:27
in reply to "RE: Meerkats are so Passé..."
I have no problem at all with bleeding edge or, obviously for an early-adopter, with the associated bugs. During most releases Ubuntu feels like it's leaping forward at a pace, but Maverick just feels like a stop-gap until unico- oops, I mean GNOME 3. Fiddling round the edges. This is one of the problems with a 6-month cycle; some releases will be inevitably humdrum.
Still, it's provided something to moan about, and that's always a boon!
RE[2]: Meerkats are so Pass�©...
by orestes on Sun 10th Oct 2010 21:11
in reply to "RE: Meerkats are so Passé..."





Member since:
2009-06-20
Rhaaa, for ****'s sake, everybody shouted at Ubuntu for being to bleeding-edge and shipping with broken last-minute implementations, and now...