Linked by vivainio on Thu 14th Oct 2010 11:31 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 445056
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
I agree with many of your concerns, however the duke nukem comparison is out of line. There is a huge difference between vaporware that never gets released, and software that is continuously improved and released.
Kde 4 today works great ... when it works. When it doesn't work, it doesn't work too well. I wouldn't describe it as unstable, maybe just less stable than other desktop environments. Part of that is just the maturity of the code base. It also concerns me that the existing core is being changed, but it sounds like a lot of the framework will remain intact. Maybe it won't be that much of a change, but it still has the possibility of removing focus from the small tweaks and bug fixes to the deeper changes.




Member since:
2005-09-27
I think you are forced to move to QML at least you want to mantaint all the legacy code your self. Witch I don't think it will be the case.
But what kind of Nokia employee would you be if you had no faith in the toolkit your employeer mantains?
I just can't avoid to compare KDE4 with with DukeNukem Forever.
Peace, and I wish you a flawless migration.
Edited 2010-10-14 14:21 UTC