Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Oct 2010 16:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 445564
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2008-06-24
That's an interesting distinction considering laptops of years past had pretty small screens by todays standards but were less powerful than the netbooks of today. Time certainly can be a perspective killer. :p
As was said earlier, the distinction should not be based off of attributes of any given feature (screen size, keyboard key count, touch screen, hard drive size, etc.). Considering nearly every phone these days has an operating system, I'd say that would be enough to call it a PC (personal computer). Hell, even your average graphing calculator these days should be called a PC.
So in my mind, if it runs an operating system that allows it to execute various programs/functions and is not completely locked down from outside influence, then it is a personal computer.
I realize this definition is broad enough to include things like routers, firewalls, even some switches, and the old 1541 floppy drive from Commodore, but it is the only definition that makes sense in my mind that doesn't include artificial limitations.