Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 18th Oct 2010 16:00 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 445798
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-02-25
The iPad is a companion to a computer and not an independent device. Think about it - you need a computer to update iOS, transfer pictures or video from your camera, transfer music, etc. It also doesn't support true multitasking like all PC's in the last several decades. It was built with a focus on allowing users to consume content rather than create it (I know there are apps to create content on the iPad and most of them are watered down versions of their Mac counterparts).

Apple does not market the iPad as a PC because it is not and this makes sense from their point of view. If they made it an independent device, then you wouldn't need to buy an actual computer and that would start to diminish sales of their other products, especially MacBooks.
Finally, if you still insist on defining the iPad as a PC, then you should also include all smartphones since they are very similar to the iPad. Then we would get to have fun resurrecting the debate over the definition of a smartphone.