Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Oct 2010 12:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 445837
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
You realize that the Android world have both types of phones? Completely open (e.g. the OpenMoko Android port) and not that open (Motorola). You are free to choose whichever you like. And I am perfectly happy with this and so is Linus Torvalds (hint: GPLv3).
Also, access to radio is limited due to some US law.
Also, access to radio is limited due to some US law.
I find that particularly interesting because one can import just about any Chinese Android-based phone into the U.S. and hack away to their heart's content, without fear of boot ROM locks and illegally obtained radio firmware. Granted, you won't have access to the Market and official Google apps, but if you're wanting your own custom Android phone you'll find alternatives to those or compile your own anyway.
Short of buying an N900 (and as much as I like my Android, I still want one), it's as close to a truly open phone as you can get right now.
The whole point of android being "open" is that people can buy a phone, and then download the Android source
Hm... Thank you for enlightening us. You are probably Andy Rubin or one of the strategists at Google?
My speculation is, that Android is open because any H/W company can freely adapt, port it and still have the same platform.




Member since:
2006-07-25
Make your own phone? Are you mad? The whole point of android being "open" is that people can buy a phone, and then download the Android source, compile and install it. In reality they *can't* do that, because
A) Most phones have locked boot-loaders. and
B) There's no source for many of the drivers or the radio firmware. You have to (illegally) copy the binaries that came with the phone, and even then you can't add features, fix bug and so on.