Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Oct 2010 12:23 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 445838
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
However that has nothing to do with iOS vs Android. There is nothing stopping HTC, Samsung or Motorola from saying you're only allowed to sell our phones if you leave them 'pure' and allow us to update the OS as we please. If their phone is desirable enough they might even manage to get a carrier or two to agree. However as long as people are happy to buy carrier crippled phones there is no incentive for HTC, Samsung or Motorola to make such a demand.




Member since:
2005-07-06
My biggest disappointment is that it turned out like Blackberry.
Sure, you have a device running the same "OS", but your totally dependent on the cell provider for what version you run, when you get updates, etc..
This leads to different features being available on the same phone depending on what vendor you use.
Like Verizon who likes to disable core phone OS features so they can charge you for them.
This is one of the things I hated about the Blackberry, some providers took forever to release updates to their phones.
The best thing about the iPhone is your no longer dependent on waiting for your cell phone provider to give you the new version, something many months later than your friends provider, in the case of some phone companies never and your SOL stuck on the ancient version it came with.
Edited 2010-10-19 20:33 UTC