Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 19th Oct 2010 21:42 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 445889
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[5]: Who's reality distortion field is it really???
by Neolander on Wed 20th Oct 2010 05:54
in reply to "RE[4]: Who's reality distortion field is it really???"
1) The only iPhone that's depreciated is the 2G, which is ~four years old. Your father's 3G can run iOS4.
And with how much features disabled exactly ?
I find these discussions about firmware upgrades a bit pointless. Upgrading a firmware is a dangerous task which can break the device if something goes wrong. Not to mention potential performance issues, with iOS4-like market fragmentation as the sole known alternative, and usability ones if the new firmware behaves differently in some way (I've seen a real-life example of this with an iTouch which had been upgraded to iOS 4). Average users just shouldn't have to care about it.
If you were satisfied with the device you bought and if app compatibility is done right, you shouldn't need the upgrade. If you weren't satisfied, you shouldn't have bought the device in the first place.
Now, if you tell me that upgrading the firmware is for geeks only, then I'm okay with that. But geeks have enough knowledge to install a custom FW, and to try to fix the device themselves if they break it.
Edited 2010-10-20 06:11 UTC




Member since:
2005-08-12
1) The only iPhone that's depreciated is the 2G, which is ~four years old. Your father's 3G can run iOS4.
2) All applications are forwards compatible. Expecting applications to also be backwards compatible is insane; that would mean the featureset of the phone could never be improved on.