Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 20th Oct 2010 19:02 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 446028
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/21/13 15:53 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2009-09-17
I'm very impressed by the improved expose, or mission control as they are calling it. It seems like a very nice way to manage a lot of programs even when you have many running in full screen. It a nice improvement to the old alt-tab standard that windows and linux users are used to.
A lot of the other changes seems superfluousness to me though, the whole show all app icons on the screen thing is way to iphone for me, a dock and a quicksilver like app launcher are all I need. But I can see how some people will like it. In fact I dislike almost every change that just makes things work more like iOS. They might work ok on say the new macbook airs, but it just seems like a lot of wasted space for someone using a 27 inch desktop. But again I can see some people getting use out of it.
The app store is a great concept in theory. But for me it all comes down to one question, how easy is it to add new repos as sources. Centralized app repos are great and have a lot of benefits, but being locked to one and only one repo has a lot of risks and gives apples a shitload of control over developers and users, especially if they rule thing as capriciously and arbitrarily as they control their phone app store.