To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Considering Nokia loosened the licensing terms when they purchased Trolltech, plus their push for Meego as an open platform for phones/tablets, which QT is their main contribution, I think it is a safe assumption that QT will remain LGPL.
You are attempting to spread fear, without a slightest bit of evidence, that Nokia may close the platform, despite already opened it up further than it was before.
Stop spreading FUD, troll.
There is no speculation involved at all on my part in pointing out that Nokia's only decision to date regarding the license of Qt was to choose LGPLv3 for it.
That is a plain, straightforward, well documented fact.
Hiev, stop talking out of your back orifice. Nokia dropped their requirement for copyright assignment in May 2009.
Our goal with the new site is to make this process as simple and welcoming as possible, and that’s why we will no longer ask for copyright assignment.
http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2009/05/11/qt-public-repository-launched/
So even if Nokia would want to relicense, they would have to ask permission from every outside contributor or rewrite every outside contribution themselves. This makes the probability of a license change pretty low.





Member since:
2007-02-17
The next version AFAIK will also be LGPL v3, but what does it matter since the current version (Qt 4.7) is LGPL v3?
If Nokia withdraw subsequent version of Qt as no longer GPLv3, (which would be suicide BTW for Nokia's involvement in Qt), then the community would simply fork Qt 4.7 and move on.
While Nokia continue to keep Qt as GPL, then the community will continue to support them.
Right now, Nokia enjoys considerable support, help and contribution from the community.
Edited 2010-10-21 01:42 UTC