To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Considering Nokia loosened the licensing terms when they purchased Trolltech, plus their push for Meego as an open platform for phones/tablets, which QT is their main contribution, I think it is a safe assumption that QT will remain LGPL.
You are attempting to spread fear, without a slightest bit of evidence, that Nokia may close the platform, despite already opened it up further than it was before.
Stop spreading FUD, troll.
There is no speculation involved at all on my part in pointing out that Nokia's only decision to date regarding the license of Qt was to choose LGPLv3 for it.
That is a plain, straightforward, well documented fact.
Their acts speak to them
That's so true, wasn't Nokia the one who oposed to ogg video as a HTML5 standar? and the one who is know using patents to sue the competence? What does that speak to you? oh and ain't Nokia being acussed of human righs violations an opression?
http://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2010/10/saharkhiz-v-nokia
Edited 2010-10-21 03:34 UTC
As it is, not only would the comunity have that option the last Qt release would become released under a BSD license making it possible for anyone to make their own proprietary version if they so wishes.
Hiev, stop talking out of your back orifice. Nokia dropped their requirement for copyright assignment in May 2009.
Our goal with the new site is to make this process as simple and welcoming as possible, and that’s why we will no longer ask for copyright assignment.
http://labs.qt.nokia.com/2009/05/11/qt-public-repository-launched/
So even if Nokia would want to relicense, they would have to ask permission from every outside contributor or rewrite every outside contribution themselves. This makes the probability of a license change pretty low.





Member since:
2005-09-27
No, you don't now for shit what's the next version is going to be, so don't speculate.