Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Oct 2010 09:13 UTC
Mac OS X After the news that the new MacBook Airs do not ship with Flash pre-installed (which is news considering Flash has been part of Mac OS X for a very long time), we now have news that Apple is also taking what appears to be the first steps towards removing Apple's own Java runtime from Mac OS X.
Thread beginning with comment 446249
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: What about vi ...
by pica on Thu 21st Oct 2010 10:53 UTC in reply to "RE: What about vi ..."
Member since:

Admitted vi is a CLI based application. As a consequence the HIGs are not compulsory. But Apple has been completely free to add Apple key bindings to vi.

Apple did not. Why?

Simply because users of the vi expect vi to behave like vi.

I as a user of jEdit expect jEdit to behave like jEdit. I also expect Netbeans to behave like Netbeans. And so on.

If I want to use an editor which only exists on OS X, I will use neither jEdit nor Gnu Emacs. I intentionally mention the Gnu Emacs editor to show non native key bindings are not Java's fault.

If I want to create applications, which are garanteed to run only on OS X, I won't use Java ;-)


Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[3]: What about vi ...
by TheGZeus on Thu 21st Oct 2010 13:52 in reply to "RE[2]: What about vi ..."
TheGZeus Member since:


Reply Parent Score: 2