Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 21st Oct 2010 22:28 UTC, submitted by tux68
Thread beginning with comment 446567
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: The limited information makes it a meaningless metric..
by Kebabbert on Fri 22nd Oct 2010 13:59
in reply to "RE: The limited information makes it a meaningless metric.."
RE[2]: The limited information makes it a meaningless metric..
by gnufreex on Fri 22nd Oct 2010 21:15
in reply to "RE: The limited information makes it a meaningless metric.."




Member since:
2007-04-20
I kind of agree. Not only they replaced Windows for Linux, they also replaced the major components of stock exchange software. I think the latter has more impact on performance.
I have a feeling Linux is not the major contributing factor, i.e. replace it with BSD or Solaris and you're unlikely to see major performance drop.
Over the years all operating systems have been tuned for maximum efficiency, it's not the kernel developers, but application developers that write inefficient and buggy code.