Clang can build a kernel now. "The kernel can successfully boot to runlevel 5 (aka X + networking) on the Macbook, both on bare metal and in Qemu. The kernel can successfully boot to runlevel 3 on a secondary test machine, a microATX desktop box (Intel Atom). I haven't tried to start X on this box yet. The kernel can self-host; I am currently running a 'fourth generation' self-hosted Linux kernel built by a 'fourth generation' Clang."
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2010-06-02
LLVM is part of a compiler infrastructure which works like that
front-end (llvm-gcc, dragonegg, clang) --> Intermediate form (LLVM optimize this) --> Assembly code (x86, arm ..)
LLVM was started as a university research project, Apple then funded this because the switch from GPLv2 to GPLv3 in the gcc project.
The main benefits of llvm for now is the very fast compilation speed (15min for the kernel) and the error reporting which is excellent.
Member since:2005-07-06
front-end (llvm-gcc, dragonegg, clang) --> Intermediate form (LLVM optimize this) --> Assembly code (x86, arm ..)
LLVM was started as a university research project, Apple then funded this because the switch from GPLv2 to GPLv3 in the gcc project.
The main benefits of llvm for now is the very fast compilation speed (15min for the kernel) and the error reporting which is excellent.
It had less to do with the move from GPL2 to GPL3, it had to do with Apple wanting heavier integration between the compiler and the IDE so that they could provide the sort of debugging that one see's in the likes of Visual Studio. That sort of debugging needs heavy integration between the two and unfortunately it would be a violation of the GPL licence to which GCC is licenced under if Apple linked their proprietary application to GCC.
There are a load of other benefits that have been mentioned in previous conferences they've held - so it is more than just a matter of simply a response to GCC moving from GPL2 to GPL3. On a side note, there has always been a matter of friction between GCC maintainers and Apple in regards to how changes were merged back in. Now that Apple controls the development of LLVM it means it gives them more freedom or when and how they merge changes.
Member since:2009-05-12
LLVM is a low level virtual machine (hence the name), it is in the simplest form a compiler back-end. This means that it takes code that is parsed from a language (C, C++, whatever) and converts it to a program the computer can read (or an interpreter for that matter).
Clang is the front-end for the c, c++ and objective-c/c++ languages. The combination of LLVM and Clang is equivalent to GCC with the various front-ends for the languages stated above.
Why it exists? Why does anything exist? philosophy aside, basically LLVM is supposed to be more modular than GCC, and LLVM is licensed under the BSD, while GCC is GLP.
The reason that this is interesting is because the Linux kernel has been written with the GCC compiler from the start. Being able to compile, not to mention have the code run somewhat correctly, is a milestone because software like kernels ask a lot out of compilers. Also different compilers may be able to point out problems that were not seen before.
The last thing is that because both compilers conform to an ansi spec, making sure that the kernel builds with both compilers gives better assurance that the kernel code complies with the ansi standard, which cannot hurt.
Member since:2005-07-11
This is a great starting point
http://llvm.org/
I really want to have a go at creating my own little language for the hang of it, but time does not permit right now. Basically I could write a compiler for a new language that could be built on any number of platforms.
Nice...
Clang is an example of an app build using LLVM...
Member since:2007-08-03
There's an awesome little example of this here:
http://llvm.org/docs/tutorial/
Member since:2006-08-02
At an event earlier today, Microsoft unveiled the next Xbox - the third model, but confusingly named Xbox One. The big focus was TV, integrated Kinect, and all the other stuff we all expected to be forced down our throats. I think it took them 25 minutes to actually come to what should be the core of the story: gaming. Nothing groundbreaking in the gaming department, except for how Microsoft intends to handle the used games market and borrowing games from friends: pay up, buddy!
The day has finally come! Jolla has finally announced the launch device for its Sailfish operating system - and by god this is a looker. It's decidedly different from other phones out there, but it has good specifications and carries a relatively reasonably price tag - EUR 399, and it's up for pre-order today, shipping in the fourth quarter of this year.
Why does Google get so much credit in the technology industry? Why, despite the company's many obvious failings, do many geeks and enthusiasts still hold a somewhat positive view on the all-knowing technology giant? A specific talk at Google I/O this week provides the answer.
OSNews is a sponsor of this year's O'Reilly OSCON in Portland, Oregon, USA. A lucky OSNews reader will win a free three-day pass, including two tutorials days. To win the pass, post a comment on this story saying something about Open Source Software or OSCON. We'll pick a winner at random next week. If you don't have an OSNews account, you may email us your entry. Part of the conference is the 9th annual Open Source Awards, and today the 16th is the deadline for nominations. If you'd like to nominate an outstanding open source contributor, do it here. Read on for more information about OSCON. Update: The 20% discount code for OSNews readers is "OSN."
"Windows is indeed slower than other operating systems in many scenarios, and the gap is worsening." That's one way to start an insider explanation of why Windows' performance isn't up to snuff. Written by someone who actually contributes code to the Windows NT kernel, the comment on Hacker News, later deleted but reposted with permission on Marc Bevand's blog, paints a very dreary picture of the state of Windows development. The root issue? Think of how Linux is developed, and you'll know the answer.
This is one of those news items that's fun to write, fun to read, fun to comment on, and where no one will be able to say anything unkind. It's all just one big ball of awesome fluffiness. TuneTracker, the BeOS radio automation software, has just released something very special: TuneTracker System 5, the first version designed entirely and specifically for Haiku. In fact, it actually includes Haiku in the software package. Better yet, TuneTracker also unveiled several system-in-a-box products - which have Haiku and TuneTracker pre-installed.
Exactly twenty years ago, a document was published that played a huge role in establishing the web as we know it today. Twenty years later, and this simple and straightforward document is proof of an irrefutable fact: while closed technologies can change markets, open technologies can change the world.Oh multitasking. That staple of computing that got thrown out the window with many modern smartphones. We got some rudimentary thing in its place - but even as multitasking on phone and tablets improves, its user-visible side remains cumbersome. Windows 8 has a neat implementation, and now it's time Android follows in it footsteps.They're here! Whether that excites you or not remains to be seen, but the Galaxy S4, which will most likely become the best selling Android smartphone of the year by a huge margin, has been reviewed by all the major sites, and there's lots of interesting conclusions in there - although I think most of you will get the gist.Nokia has posted its quarterly results for the first quarter of 2013, and just like the quarters that came before, there's not a whole lot of good news in there. The rise in Lumia sales still can't even dream of making up for the sales drop in Symbian phones, and when broken down in versions, the sales figures for Windows Phone 8 Lumias in particular are very disappointing. In North America, Nokia is getting slaughtered.
Member since:
2005-10-11
http://clang.llvm.org/index.html
What is LLVM? Why does it exist? What technology can it be compared to? What benefit does this have to the linux kernel?
Okay I started this post as an idiot. But I would like to know what this LLVM business is.