Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Oct 2010 22:33 UTC, submitted by sawboss
In the News "The Russian state plans to revamp its computer services with a Windows rival to reduce its dependence on US giant Microsoft and better monitor computer security, a lawmaker said Wednesday. Moscow will earmark 150 million rubles (3.5 million euros, 4.9 million dollars) to develop a national software system based on the Linux operating system, Russian deputy Ilia Ponomarev told AFP, confirming an earlier report in the Vedomosti daily." Right. I guess this has absolutely nothing to do with this. Want to buy a unicorn?
Thread beginning with comment 447378
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: cold war
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Thu 28th Oct 2010 01:52 UTC in reply to "RE: cold war"
Bill Shooter of Bul
Member since:
2006-07-14

Yeah, but the threat doesn't come from the fact that Microsoft isn't located in Russia, but that the source is closed. Just using an existing distro of linux would probably be more economical and solve all of their security/paranoia concerns.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[3]: cold war
by Lennie on Thu 28th Oct 2010 04:56 in reply to "RE[2]: cold war"
Lennie Member since:
2007-09-22

The source is not closed to Russia, they get read-access, it just is they can't compile it, Microsoft ships them binaries.

Well, ok, yes, it's closed. :-)

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[4]: cold war
by Nth_Man on Thu 28th Oct 2010 09:18 in reply to "RE[3]: cold war"
Nth_Man Member since:
2010-05-16

The source is not closed to Russia, they get read-access, it just is they can't compile it, Microsoft ships them binaries.

Well, ok, yes, it's closed. :-)

Yes, they don't know if the source code they are shown... is the one they use in the binaries or not. They don't know what the hell their computers are doing.

Ah, and Microsoft has to obey the government of the U.S. of America. And if they say "put this in the code", Microsoft is obligated to put it. And we all know it.

Reply Parent Score: 6

RE[3]: cold war
by somebody on Thu 28th Oct 2010 05:56 in reply to "RE[2]: cold war"
somebody Member since:
2005-07-07

Just using an existing distro of linux would probably be more economical and solve all of their security/paranoia concerns.


and they probably will do exactly that. with some sane defaults for their country. things like better translation, default regional settings, few softwares that match their needs better com to my mind.

Edited 2010-10-28 05:56 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 5