To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
<nostalgia>I remember buying the 2.1.5 CD set. Coming from Linux, I really liked it, and started experimenting every now and then. Without an internet connection, I couldn't really use ports. So, I usually copied over source tarballs from the Linux Developer Resource Kit or Slackware CDs (which used to include Sunsite and TSX-11 snapshots), and modified the portfiles to compile with those tarballs. With the 2.2.8 set I got really hooked, and became a regular BSD user, until a few years ago (unless OS X counts).</nostalgia>
Looking at the quarterly reports, I am always amazed how much they get done outside the limelight. It must be hard to get contributors with virtually no media exposure.
Just thinking back myself when I first got hooked on this wonderful operating system when it was known as 386BSD-0.1. I had to use a mail to FTP gateway to individually download a ton of floppy images and then write each one to a 3.5" floppy and then install the system from floppy. It took forever but it was worth it. I wonder what happened to some of the characters around in those days - Jordan K Hubbard and Jesus Monroe Jnr.




Member since:
2005-07-12
I've been a FreeBSD fan since 4.6 was the latest, and have loved the cohesiveness of the whole project. In my mind, Debian is the only Linux distribution that comes close in that regard.
My favorite part from the report:
It's been a while since I tried out PC-BSD, but I remember my brief stint with it fondly. FreeBSD does need a more capable package management solution. Hopefully this suffices.
Edited 2010-10-28 05:36 UTC