Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Oct 2010 22:33 UTC, submitted by sawboss
In the News "The Russian state plans to revamp its computer services with a Windows rival to reduce its dependence on US giant Microsoft and better monitor computer security, a lawmaker said Wednesday. Moscow will earmark 150 million rubles (3.5 million euros, 4.9 million dollars) to develop a national software system based on the Linux operating system, Russian deputy Ilia Ponomarev told AFP, confirming an earlier report in the Vedomosti daily." Right. I guess this has absolutely nothing to do with this. Want to buy a unicorn?
Thread beginning with comment 447439
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: licences
by spiderman on Thu 28th Oct 2010 12:39 UTC in reply to "RE: licences "
spiderman
Member since:
2008-10-23

even Linux versions are precompiled for (at best) the Ubuntu LTS release.

Give me an executable compiled for Ubuntu LTS and I'll run it on any GNU/linux distro on the same architecture. In the worst case I'll setup a chroot with all the dependencies.

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[3]: licences
by ddc_ on Thu 28th Oct 2010 18:10 in reply to "RE[2]: licences "
ddc_ Member since:
2006-12-05

Well, the main problem is that You have to maintain it separately from the rest of the system. While certain level of security is provided by the means of Your distribution of choice, You have to manually maintain Your chroot, investigate the security issues of the chroot versions and etc. It is a significant overhead.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: licences
by spiderman on Fri 29th Oct 2010 05:42 in reply to "RE[3]: licences "
spiderman Member since:
2008-10-23

In the worst case, man. I can setup symbolic links in the chroot to use the base system libraries and change just the one or two that are not compatible. Those can be fetched directly from the Ubuntu repos.

Reply Parent Score: 3