Linked by Thom Holwerda on Wed 27th Oct 2010 22:29 UTC, submitted by Daniel Gerzo
Thread beginning with comment 447441
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Comment by dnebdal
by danieldk on Thu 28th Oct 2010 15:20
in reply to "RE: Comment by dnebdal"
It is a trade-off. Disk space is not so much of an issue. But if some commonly-used library contains a security vulnerability, lots of PBIs need upgrading. I am not sure if the average desktop user cares. And it's certainly not a step back from OS X application bundles, or Windows' "lets include all DLLs with the application to be sure"*.
* Not meant as a critique, I do this as well.
Edited 2010-10-28 15:21 UTC




Member since:
2007-03-26
Interesting.
With how cheap disk space is these days, I can see the logic in what they're doing.
Speculating for a moment: I wouldn't be suprised if some of the additional disk space could be recovered via ZFS deduping.