Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Oct 2010 18:02 UTC, submitted by viator
Legal If you can't compete, litigate. This train of thought has been quite prevalent among major technology companies as of late, most notably by Apple and Microsoft, who both cannot compete with Android on merit, so they have to resort to patent lawsuits and FUD. Both Asustek and Acer have revealed that Microsoft plans to impose royalty fees upon the two Taiwanese hardware makers to prevent them from shipping Android and/or Chrome OS devices.
Thread beginning with comment 447477
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Threatened
by TheGZeus on Thu 28th Oct 2010 18:47 UTC in reply to "Threatened"
TheGZeus
Member since:
2010-05-19

FAT32 patents.
That's how they got HTC.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Threatened
by l3v1 on Thu 28th Oct 2010 19:52 in reply to "RE: Threatened"
l3v1 Member since:
2005-07-06

FAT32 patents.
That's how they got HTC.


Fortunately ChromeOS/Linux support quite a number of great file systems (and in the case of ChromeOS the local FS doesn't matter that much, so FAT32 could be stripped out and nobody would care), unlike some other who likes to threaten more than to compete,

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Threatened
by TheGZeus on Thu 28th Oct 2010 19:57 in reply to "RE[2]: Threatened"
TheGZeus Member since:
2010-05-19

Indeed.

The issue is that all SD cards would need to be re-formatted and interoperability would be destroyed.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Threatened
by ChoK on Thu 28th Oct 2010 20:50 in reply to "RE[2]: Threatened"
ChoK Member since:
2010-06-02

I'm pretty sure chrome OS devices will have an USB port. FAT32 and maybe soon exFAT will be needed for compatibility with windows people.

Edit: the comments system seems a tad broken, I remember comments being in tree view, classified by topic. Now with have 4 people answering the same thing to the "drop FAT32" comment.

Edited 2010-10-28 20:52 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[2]: Threatened
by vivainio on Thu 28th Oct 2010 20:55 in reply to "RE: Threatened"
vivainio Member since:
2008-12-26

FAT32 patents.
That's how they got HTC.


I don't think so, IIRC fat code was cleared of patent threads earlier.

They cite:

"Microsoft plans to impose royalty fees on Taiwan-based vendors of Android handsets for using its patents in e-mail, multimedia and other functions"

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Threatened
by lemur2 on Thu 28th Oct 2010 22:13 in reply to "RE: Threatened"
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

FAT32 patents. That's how they got HTC.


Linux doesn't violate any of Microsoft's patents for long filenames on FAT32. Microsoft hold patents for being able to write both a long file name and a short file name (the old 8.3 FILE.NAM) for the same file at the same time in a FAT32 directory.

Linux doesn't do that. Linux writes either a long filename, or a short filename, but never both. It doesn't violate Microsoft's patent, because it simply doesn't do the patented function.

The FAT filesystem itself is an IBM invention, BTW.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[3]: Threatened
by TheGZeus on Thu 28th Oct 2010 22:44 in reply to "RE[2]: Threatened"
TheGZeus Member since:
2010-05-19

I didn't say they violated them. I said that's what they used against HTC.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[3]: Threatened
by rjamorim on Thu 28th Oct 2010 22:53 in reply to "RE[2]: Threatened"
rjamorim Member since:
2005-12-05

The FAT filesystem itself is an IBM invention, BTW.


No it is not.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File_Allocation_Table#History

Reply Parent Score: 4