Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Oct 2010 20:07 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 447528
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
There are two issues.
One is the file is re-published in a different license. (Remember the discussion where BSD code was found in Linux kernel code? It would be OK to copy the code, even relicense under GPL, only if they had attributed to the original author. But an employee wanted to take the credit).
The second one is with patents (subject of the other lawsuit). Even if you publish your code under GPL, there are some limitations due to patents (this is why we have GPL3 changed that provisions).
Here is the GPL version:
http://cvs.savannah.gnu.org/viewvc/classpath/gnu/java/security/x509...
Note the variable and method order in all 3 files.
The file in question is not from the GPL implementation.




Member since:
2006-01-22
The original file from Oracle (Sun) states it's licensed under the terms of GPLv2 (even with Classpath exception). So what's the problem? Does Google violate the GPL and has licensed Dalvik under a incompatible license? So Oracle actually defends the GPL and hence free/open source software? Then Oracle would be the good guy here.
Can anyone tell me what's going on, please?