Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 29th Oct 2010 20:48 UTC
Microsoft Most websites glossed over this, but we didn't. Silverlight, once touted as Microsoft's answer to Adobe's Flash, has been retooled from its original purpose. Microsoft is betting big on HTML5 instead, turning Silverlight into the development platform for Windows Phone, and that's it. So... Silverlight is dead - long live Silerlight?
Thread beginning with comment 447759
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE: Moonlight
by lemur2 on Sat 30th Oct 2010 12:04 UTC in reply to "Moonlight"
Member since:

It is interesting to see what's going to happen with Moonlight now. At least it doesn't seem as urgent now that SL as web plugin ends up being less of a requirement than anticipated at the time that project was founded...

If Moonlight isn't a "requirement" (it never was, BTW), then what of Mono?

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: Moonlight
by vivainio on Sat 30th Oct 2010 18:01 in reply to "RE: Moonlight"
vivainio Member since:

If Moonlight isn't a "requirement" (it never was, BTW), then what of Mono?

Mono has entirely different dynamics from Moonlight. While ML was more of a "browser plugin" / utility thing, Mono is a development environment. Haskell or Common Lisp are not "required" either, but they have a reason to be available because some people like to code using them - and one thing Open Source should endorse is people's freedom to write code in whatever environment works for them.

I bet most of us agree that Mono should not be a critical part of the free desktop infrastructure (due to the close MS ties), but if it gives us a few cool apps - why not have it around, net benefit is bigger than the small risk it bears.

Edited 2010-10-30 18:02 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 3