Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Oct 2010 18:02 UTC, submitted by viator
Legal If you can't compete, litigate. This train of thought has been quite prevalent among major technology companies as of late, most notably by Apple and Microsoft, who both cannot compete with Android on merit, so they have to resort to patent lawsuits and FUD. Both Asustek and Acer have revealed that Microsoft plans to impose royalty fees upon the two Taiwanese hardware makers to prevent them from shipping Android and/or Chrome OS devices.
Thread beginning with comment 447771
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Zero surprise.
by fewt on Sat 30th Oct 2010 13:54 UTC in reply to "RE[2]: Zero surprise."
fewt
Member since:
2010-06-09

That tin foil hat is pretty snug huh? Funny how people aren't allowed to have dissenting opinions without getting accused of being paid by company X. There really are free thinkers that happen disagree with you; this doesn't make them "paid M$ $hills", it just means that they disagree. Making baseless accusations doesn't strengthen your argument, it weakens it.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[4]: Zero surprise.
by TheGZeus on Sat 30th Oct 2010 16:37 in reply to "RE[3]: Zero surprise."
TheGZeus Member since:
2010-05-19

It makes them fools, regardless.

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: Zero surprise.
by fewt on Sun 31st Oct 2010 01:11 in reply to "RE[4]: Zero surprise."
fewt Member since:
2010-06-09

No, it certainly does not.

Reply Parent Score: 0

RE[4]: Zero surprise.
by lemur2 on Sun 31st Oct 2010 11:05 in reply to "RE[3]: Zero surprise."
lemur2 Member since:
2007-02-17

That tin foil hat is pretty snug huh? Funny how people aren't allowed to have dissenting opinions without getting accused of being paid by company X. There really are free thinkers that happen disagree with you; this doesn't make them "paid MS $hills", it just means that they disagree. Making baseless accusations doesn't strengthen your argument, it weakens it.


So you are not prepared then to give us your view on this situation, wherein Microsoft is asking a company to pay for a license to Microsoft patents which the company's products do not embody?

Why am I not surprised?

BTW, it occurs to me to ponder ... why would anybody who is not working for Microsoft's interests, on a topic where someone started out by claiming that "they are no fan of Microsoft", be afraid to give us their opinion on that point?

What could possibly be holding you back, fewt?

Edited 2010-10-31 11:07 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE[5]: Zero surprise.
by fewt on Sun 31st Oct 2010 12:13 in reply to "RE[4]: Zero surprise."
fewt Member since:
2010-06-09

"Microsoft is asking a company to pay for a license to Microsoft patents which the company's products do not embody?"

You have no evidence that Android contains no Microsoft patented technology. Your comment is purely speculation.

"Why am I not surprised?"

It is easy for you to jump to conclusions it seems. A common artifact of a paranoid delusion.

"BTW, it occurs to me to ponder ... why would anybody who is not working for Microsoft's interests, on a topic where someone started out by claiming that "they are no fan of Microsoft", be afraid to give us their opinion on that point?"

What could possibly be holding you back, fewt?"

Oh, I see. So I get a paycheck from Microsoft too, huh. I hadn't given an opinion because I don't have all of the facts. What I do know though is that you don't have all of the facts either, yet here you are pretending that you do. If Microsoft has patents on technology in Android, Microsoft has a right to royalties on device sales within countries where patent laws allow it. This is the law, even if you don't like it. These various vendors are free to take Microsoft to court if they believe that Microsoft is wrong.

Reply Parent Score: 2