Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 29th Oct 2010 20:48 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 447820
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: If I had to choose...
by Neolander on Sun 31st Oct 2010 09:02
in reply to "RE: If I had to choose..."
If I remember well, on my Athlon 3000+/1GB RAM/7800GT config, it was a bit heavy for video playback but still acceptable (~20-30% CPU on Ubuntu 9.04 vs 60+% on older releases).
On Mac, I heard that there were some major improvements for some Mac hardware using the "Gala" beta, too.
Edited 2010-10-31 09:06 UTC
RE[3]: If I had to choose...
by _txf_ on Sun 31st Oct 2010 11:30
in reply to "RE[2]: If I had to choose..."





Member since:
2008-12-26
Anecdotal evidence (i.e. I heard it on "Linux Action Show" podcast) suggests that the Flash 10 betas for Linux use hardly any CPU when watching video. Same will probably apply for macs.
Edited 2010-10-31 06:08 UTC