Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 28th Oct 2010 20:07 UTC, submitted by poundsmack
Thread beginning with comment 447967
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: I went over the code
by Neolander on Mon 1st Nov 2010 12:23
in reply to "RE[2]: I went over the code"
RE[3]: I went over the code
by sorpigal on Mon 1st Nov 2010 13:45
in reply to "RE[2]: I went over the code"
I strongly disagree. I read through the sample so-called "copied code" and it's a lot less similar than code SCO claimed was 'copied' into Linux, and where it is similar it's pretty often due to implementing a known interface.
If you tell ten developers to write a quicksort function in C (for example) you'll get ten results which, while not identical, will be very similar and will be more similar to each other than these examples, right down to identical variable deceleration order. Even if there are a billion ways you *could* do the same thing, chances are culture, tradition and best practices will reduce that set down to a relatively small handful of similar implementations.




Member since:
2007-07-27
In how many ways can you declare 10 variables? The answer is 10! = 3.6 million ways. Almost 4 million ways.
The probability that the Google programmer chose exactly the same ordering as Oracle, would be 1 in 4 million. Highly unlikely.
Chances are more than 99.99999% the code is a copy.