Linked by Thom Holwerda on Thu 4th Nov 2010 22:32 UTC
Internet & Networking "What if you could essentially fake your death online - completely delete any trace of yourself from Facebook, Twitter, blogs, forums, Usenet, and anywhere else there might be some record of your existence. Such a concept is largely impossible today, especially given complications from services like Facebook combined with caches and mirrors of practically everything ever e-created. The European Commission wants to change that."
Thread beginning with comment 448624
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[2]: Portuguese law
by Sodki on Fri 5th Nov 2010 11:06 UTC in reply to "RE: Portuguese law"
Sodki
Member since:
2005-11-10

That seems false to me. Once people and businesses can be forced (by police action if necessary) to delete data that is in their own storage systems then their data is now under collectivized ownership. That starts the slippery slope of 'what the authorities will allow you to store.'

You're reading it wrong. It's your data. It's the data that you provided to the organization or company. The decision to take it back is your decision. Not RIAA's, not the authorities. This is not about copyright infringement, this is about your personal data.

Slander laws should cover this sort of thing. This political action is waaaay overkill.

This has absolutely nothing to do with slander. This is not about using your data abusively, this is about storing personal information/data.

People willingly submitted their personal information and Facebook apparently followed the law and people are upset? This nanny-state law is trying to protect people from their own stupid/foolish actions.

Why shouldn't people have the right to take back information that they own?

People say they want freedom until they stupidly submit their personal information onto Internet websites and then they cry foul when that information spreads on the global network. Absolutely absurd. What happened to common sense?

I agree with you on this. People should know what they're getting into. And most of the times they do, but choose to ignore it. It's absurd. It also has nothing to do with the case at hand.

Reply Parent Score: 3