Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 5th Nov 2010 19:15 UTC, submitted by Debjit
Finally. Finally the leader of a major distribution who has the guts to stand up and say what a lot of people have known for a long time, but didn't dare to say because it usually leads to a storm of criticism. Mark Shuttleworth has announced that Ubuntu will be moving away from X.org, opting to go with Wayland instead.
Thread beginning with comment 448935
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
Member since:2006-08-15
My primary concern with this is further desktop fragmentation, we have had GNOME and KDE along with a slew of other toolkits for a long time but they at least have all had X as a common underlayer. If switching to Wayland causes developers to further choose between X and Wayland (which in many cases it appears it will) then we will have further, and more fundamental, fragmentation than we already do especially if Wayland doesn't replace all of X's features e.g. network transparency, leaving X as a competitor as opposed to replacing it.
I believe Wayland will end up replacing X in the long run, and I think X will remain as a subsystem layer for running legacy X11 applications.
But I won't even bother to have X11 as a subsystem, I will try to have only Wayland applications installed on my system.
But let's be serious, who is the person that is going to be interested in running a legacy windowing system when there is a better and modern one which is faster, better and more suitable for desktop use? Not me for sure.
And if Wayland doesn't end up replacing X, the developers could simply target to the highest level APIs which are Qt, GTK+, etc. Which both of them are already working on X11 and Wayland.
Edited 2010-11-06 22:22 UTC
Member since:2005-11-13
With respect to Wayland replacing X, I agree, it probably will as long as it doesn't target too different a use-case then X. Currently X has all sorts of features that I don't use on my laptop, but if X is replaced without those features it is likely that both systems will remain and be sort of compatible ala X on OS X. So even though I may not use X's more esoteric features, it is still important to me that its replacement has them so that we can completely replace X. Otherwise, lets fix X's performance for the single user systems and keep its features. We don't need two competing and supported windowing systems to choose between even if they are compatible. That is more bloated and cumbersome that anyone could ever claim that X is.
Edited 2010-11-06 23:12 UTC
Member since:2005-07-11
My primary concern with this is further desktop fragmentation, we have had GNOME and KDE along with a slew of other toolkits for a long time but they at least have all had X as a common underlayer. If switching to Wayland causes developers to further choose between X and Wayland (which in many cases it appears it will) then we will have further, and more fundamental, fragmentation than we already do especially if Wayland doesn't replace all of X's features e.g. network transparency, leaving X as a competitor as opposed to replacing it.
If Wayland does take off, and replace Xorg on Linux, it will cause a schism between Linux-based OSes, and non-Linux-based OSes.
It's already starting with all the Linux-kernel-only features going into Xorg (GEM, KMS, etc) splitting Xorg support between Linux and non-Linux systems.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
"In NixOS, the entire operating system - the kernel, applications, system packages, configuration files, and so on - is built by the Nix package manager from a description in a purely functional build language. The fact that it's purely functional essentially means that building a new configuration cannot overwrite previous configurations. Most of the other features follow from this." Interesting approach. A Linux distribution, sure, but with some very refreshing ideas about system configuration.
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Google added, among other features, C/C++ support to its new version of AIDE. From Android-IDE, "Now you can write parts of your app or your whole app in C/C++ on your device. AIDE supports the Standard Android NDK toolchain (GCC 4.6 + Bionic, STL, ...). No changes are necessary if you want to build an app developed on a PC with Eclipse. C/C++ development is fully integrated: Build errors appear in the error list and files can easily be navigated to with Go to file. The editor supports C/C++ syntax highlighting."
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Ars nails it: "The answer is that Google did announce what amounts to a fairly substantial Android update yesterday. They simply did it without adding to the update fragmentation problems that continue to plague the platform. By focusing on these changes and not the apparently-waiting-in-the-wings update to the core software, Google is showing us one of the ways in which it's trying to fix the update problem."
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
"It is good for programmers to understand what goes on inside a processor. The CPU is at the heart of our career. What goes on inside the CPU? How long does it take for one instruction to run? What does it mean when a new CPU has a 12-stage pipeline, or 18-stage pipeline, or even a 'deep' 31-stage pipeline? Programs generally treat the CPU as a black box. Instructions go into the box in order, instructions come out of the box in order, and some processing magic happens inside. As a programmer, it is useful to learn what happens inside the box. This is especially true if you will be working on tasks like program optimization. If you don't know what is going on inside the CPU, how can you optimize for it? This article is about what goes on inside the x86 processor's deep pipeline."
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
"It was the only moment I heard regret slip into Otellini's voice during the several hours of conversations I had with him. 'The lesson I took away from that was, while we like to speak with data around here, so many times in my career I've ended up making decisions with my gut, and I should have followed my gut,' he said. 'My gut told me to say yes.'" The world would've been a much different place - Apple would have been less dependant on Samsung for its chips, which probably would've meant less money for Samsung to develop its Galaxy business.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 21:41 UTC
Glass is getting some love at Google I/O as well. New applications have been released - Facebook, Twitter, Evernote, Elle, Tumblr, and CNN. Perhaps more interesting: the newly announced Google Glass Developer Kit will allow offline applications and direct hardware access - great for hacking and expanding Glass' potential. This kit will really allow hackers to put Glass through its paces.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 17:04 UTC
"But Beck and Merrill decided that simply banning toxic players wasn't an acceptable solution for their game. Riot Games began experimenting with more constructive modes of player management through a formal player behavior initiative that actually conducts controlled experiments on its player base to see what helps reduce bad behavior. The results of that initiative have been shared at a lecture at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and on panels at the Penny Arcade Expo East and the Game Developers Conference." Absolutely fascinating stuff. I'm a League of Legends player, and to be honest, the community isn't nearly as bad as some make it out to be. I'm happy Riot games has the guts to employ science to address the issue.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 13:17 UTC
"Android and iOS, the number one and number two ranked smartphone operating systems worldwide, combined for 92.3% of all smartphone shipments during the first quarter of 2013 as Windows Phone crept past BlackBerry for 3rd place. According to the International Data Corporation Worldwide Quarterly Mobile Phone Tracker, Android smartphone vendors and Apple shipped a total of 199.5 million units worldwide during 1Q13, up 59.1% from the 125.4 million units shipped during 1Q12." Windows Phone doubles from a few to twice few, iOS loser market share as its growth is slower than that of the overall market. BlackBerry continues slide into irrelevance.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/16/13 12:06 UTC
"According to the latest research from our Wireless Smartphone Strategies service, global Android smartphone profits reached US$5 billion in total during the first quarter of 2013. Samsung dominated and captured an impressive 95 percent share of all Android smartphone profits." Wow.
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/15/13 23:03 UTC
"During its Keynote today, Google announced new features coming to its flagship search function - you know, that thing we all started using Google for. VP Amit Singhal spent some time discussing what Google's search functionality will eventually morph into. Google's strategy is summarized by three words: answer, converse, and anticipate. Singhal explained that many of the pieces of these upcoming changes can already be seen in products that Google has recently introduced - namely, Google Knowledge Graph and Google Now, with perhaps a splash of Google Glass, too." I hold on to my hat every time Google changes Search. It's such a vital product in my daily life.More News »
Sponsored Links
Member since:
2005-11-13
My primary concern with this is further desktop fragmentation, we have had GNOME and KDE along with a slew of other toolkits for a long time but they at least have all had X as a common underlayer. If switching to Wayland causes developers to further choose between X and Wayland (which in many cases it appears it will) then we will have further, and more fundamental, fragmentation than we already do especially if Wayland doesn't replace all of X's features e.g. network transparency, leaving X as a competitor as opposed to replacing it.