Linked by Thom Holwerda on Fri 5th Nov 2010 13:10 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 449044
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
News
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 22:43 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/20/13 21:50 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:15 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/19/13 23:11 UTC, submitted by Drumhellar
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 21:06 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/18/13 7:37 UTC
Linked by fran on 05/18/13 1:38 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 23:35 UTC, submitted by kragil
Linked by MOS6510 on 05/17/13 22:22 UTC
Linked by Thom Holwerda on 05/17/13 22:15 UTC, submitted by Tom
More News »
Sponsored Links



Member since:
2010-04-14
My problem with Apple doing away with the Xserve is that a Mac Pro won't fit in a damn rack, and while Linux is great for most things, it won't do AFS very well, and the underlying ext3 file system won't support the same naming schemes as hfs+. I can name a file "apple file 11/7/2010" no problem, but that breaks any form of Linux file system. Also, hfs+ stores a more detailed meta data file that ext3 that many programs count upon. So once you can no longer get an Xserve with a fiberchanel card, and you try to switch to xnix, all of your existing file names will be invalid. (this is all from experience!!)