Username or EmailPassword
I thought Syllable was dying - I guess I was wrong - keep up the great work!
I didn't know anyone actually used REBOL. A waning OS with a waning development platform ported to it. The license for REBOL is pretty steep when I could buy some other compiler/interpreter/framework for less, or better, use something else that is free. But I could just be missing its appeal and purpose.
I also thought it was dying, but I'm not so sure I'd change my mind just yet. To me, it still is.
I mean... is anything truly interesting being done with Syllable? Any truly good improvements? I'm not so sure I'd call this interesting. Maybe a good start would be something as simple as separating the programs on the installation disc into, you know, separate packages... instead of one massive archive to extract to the hard drive. Feels so clunky for an OS that claims to be "modern"...
To sum it up: Syllable was interesting, but it lost my interest a while ago, and this sure as hell doesn't regain any of it back... Edited 2010-11-09 05:14 UTC
i guess you are not wrong. Most of the so called "ports" are in most cases nothing more than the commands ./configure; make;make install; (and perhaps also other little adjustments). Nothing substantial has been done for syllable desktop in the last few years.
If you look at the sourcecode of syllable, nearly nothing has changed in the last years. Perhaps that's also an reason why no new version of syllable desktop was released since about 18 month, and the version before need also about 18 month (anyway more than a year, i'm sure). And it was planned to make syllable desktop release every 3 month.
Even Syllable 0.6.6 is 18 month old, i'm quite sure, that they will still not release 0.6.7 soon. I could bet that this time it will take more than 24 month (2 years).
Another ex-developer of syllable said once as a supposition: "0.6.7 will never come out".
And related to Rebol. The plans of the "co-leader" with Rebol on syllable, where one of the reasons, why at a certain time, most of the developers leaved syllable (some of the officially, others quietly without saying one word).
I liked to play with Rebol 2, I did some nice applications, but when I saw that Rebol 3 delayed for years, it became too lost my passion for it.
I remember last years, after a lot of delays, it was said: "at about christmas, we could have the R3 release, but i don't promise anything". Since than one year pasted, and it's still in alpha phase.
When is it not very visible what kind of license R3 has.
I think it would be a good idea, to ignore Rebol, till it will be really open source (GPL, BSD, MIT, or something like that). I must admit i don't know what license R3 has, but i guess it's still a quite restrictive one.
You forgot your usual complaint that Syllable is dead because there are no responses to OSNews articles. Edited 2010-11-09 22:02 UTC