Linked by Thom Holwerda on Mon 8th Nov 2010 20:29 UTC
Thread beginning with comment 449175
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
RE[3]: Action plan for Nokia on Symbian
by Bill Shooter of Bul on Tue 9th Nov 2010 03:52
in reply to "RE[2]: Action plan for Nokia on Symbian"
RE[3]: Action plan for Nokia on Symbian
by aliquis on Wed 10th Nov 2010 10:30
in reply to "RE[2]: Action plan for Nokia on Symbian"
It's all perception - what makes you think Symbian has to catch up with MeeGo?
People? (Mostly people who have used an older version I assume.) Reviews?
Comparisons with WebOS, Maemo and iOS?
Nokia themselves? (Why the need to develop it further, delay it or use Maemo/MeeGo for higher end phones unless there's a difference?)
All the other phone companies switching from Symbian to Android or something else instead of staying with Symbian?
Edited 2010-11-10 10:31 UTC




Member since:
2005-07-06
The N95 was a wonderful phone, technically very advanced and the UI worked very well - but it was all controlled with keys, not a touch screen.
Then the iPhone came out with a totally different tactile interface. The N95 8GB was a technically much better phone but the iPhone GUI was years ahead.
Nokia have spent the last few years trying to catch up with the iPhone GUI.
You've actually answered your question here. It's all perception - what makes you think Symbian has to catch up with MeeGo?