To view parent comment, click here.
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
actually, it is exactly because they don't want it. strange but true.
you set server into runlevel 3. and when you need some software you simply do this from remote machine:
ssh username@machine -Y whatever_command (like. firefox, system-config-network)
and graphic session runs on local machine not server. server is still in runlevel 3. and you never needed to go into runlevel 5 on server to configure something from gui.
i'm avid network X addict, but as long as wayland options me to run seamless remote session like one before while server is in runlevel 3... i'm all for it. seamless remoting shouldn't be hard to implement with any protocol,... while in runlevel 3? well, that i don't know
Edited 2010-11-13 17:10 UTC
You don't need GUI - far from it, all you do need X libraries (inc/ tool-kits such as GTK/QT) and SSHD to run your favorite administration tool.
Better yet, add SSH compression (ssh -C) to the mix and you can actually run X application over a fairly slow DSL or cable line. (Though I would agree that remote X is not a speed daemon - especially when uplink is below 512KB)
- Gilboa





Member since:
2006-01-14
Actually, I have seen pictures of Wayland running with 2 X servers running in it. If it runs below X so that X and X apps don't have to change, that might be a cool thing. It does require more graphics hardware than X does though, so I doubt it will ever be the default on a server distro. Of course, in 5 years maybe all servers will have 3d graphics on board.