Linked by Thom Holwerda on Tue 16th Nov 2010 22:48 UTC, submitted by Michael
Linux "In recent weeks and months there has been quite a bit of work towards improving the responsiveness of the Linux desktop with some very significant milestones building up recently and new patches continuing to come. This work is greatly improving the experience of the Linux desktop when the computer is withstanding a great deal of CPU load and memory strain. Fortunately, the exciting improvements are far from over. There is a new patch that has not yet been merged but has undergone a few revisions over the past several weeks and it is quite small - just over 200 lines of code - but it does wonders for the Linux desktop."
Thread beginning with comment 450183
To read all comments associated with this story, please click here.
BeOS like ?
by boulabiar on Tue 16th Nov 2010 23:41 UTC
boulabiar
Member since:
2009-04-18

Can I now open 2000 nautilus window without problem ?

Reply Score: 3

RE: BeOS like ?
by Soulbender on Wed 17th Nov 2010 00:14 in reply to "BeOS like ?"
Soulbender Member since:
2005-08-18

Maybe, maybe not? No-one opens 2000 Nautilus windows and no-one watches 10 movies and listens to 50 MP3's at the same time.
Maybe Linux is more concerned with being actaully usefull rather han boasting pointless accomplishments.

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: BeOS like ?
by Tuishimi on Wed 17th Nov 2010 00:36 in reply to "RE: BeOS like ?"
Tuishimi Member since:
2005-07-06

You're no fun, sometimes! ;)

Reply Parent Score: 4

RE[2]: BeOS like ?
by Valhalla on Wed 17th Nov 2010 02:08 in reply to "RE: BeOS like ?"
Valhalla Member since:
2006-01-24

Maybe, maybe not? No-one opens 2000 Nautilus windows and no-one watches 10 movies and listens to 50 MP3's at the same time.

Don't knock it until you try it.

Whoooooooaaaaaa what a rideeeeeee!!!!!!

Reply Parent Score: 3

RE[2]: BeOS like ?
by rob_mx on Wed 17th Nov 2010 03:20 in reply to "RE: BeOS like ?"
rob_mx Member since:
2005-08-04

Maybe, maybe not? No-one opens 2000 Nautilus windows and no-one watches 10 movies and listens to 50 MP3's at the same time.
Maybe Linux is more concerned with being actaully usefull rather han boasting pointless accomplishments.


No, but there are people that use audio editing applications with dozens of audio channels where latency matters. That is where being able to play 50 streams of audio at the same time without hiccups might be useful ;)

Reply Parent Score: 5

RE[2]: BeOS like ?
by Fergy on Wed 17th Nov 2010 14:22 in reply to "RE: BeOS like ?"
Fergy Member since:
2006-04-10

Maybe, maybe not? No-one opens 2000 Nautilus windows and no-one watches 10 movies and listens to 50 MP3's at the same time.
Maybe Linux is more concerned with being actaully usefull rather han boasting pointless accomplishments.

If you gave Win95 32MB of memory and a P200 it would run really nice and as long as you didn't do too much(more than 1 heavy program) with it. Now if I have a system with 3200MB of memory and 4x a P2000 I should in theory be able to do at least 10x as much without any stutters.
Something went wrong with multitasking desktops and this patch seems so be a big step towards fixing it.

Edited 2010-11-17 14:23 UTC

Reply Parent Score: 1

RE: BeOS like ?
by evert on Wed 17th Nov 2010 09:24 in reply to "BeOS like ?"
evert Member since:
2005-07-06

I agree that BeOS / Haiku was indeed able to do an awful lot of things at the same time, while still being responsive. Much better than Windows or Linux on the desktop.

But server-side... I would rather run Linux than Haiku for deamons ;-)

This patch tries to combine both benefits: a kernel usable for both server and desktop, even at the same time.

Reply Parent Score: 2

RE[2]: BeOS like ?
by No it isnt on Wed 17th Nov 2010 09:45 in reply to "RE: BeOS like ?"
No it isnt Member since:
2005-11-14

Just too bad that all those things were spinning teapots.

Reply Parent Score: 2